| By Jim Bruene on May 3, 1999 9:29 AM | Comments (0) |
Net banking companies and service providers have finally jumped into the IPO market. We were beginning to think the sector might be passed by Net mania. If all goes according to plan, within the next four to six weeks, five Internet banking companies will go public. NextCard was the first out of the gate selling 6 million shares at $20 per share on May 14 to raise $120 million. The stock briefly hit $40 before settling into a trading range in the low 30’s for a market capitalization of about $1.3 billion, or $20,000 per credit card account.
NextCard and E-Loan are leading Net-only providers of credit cards and home loans respectively. Online Resources and nFront are Net banking platform providers. Princeton eCom (formerly Princeton Telecom) is an ebilling provider and payment processor.
The companies’ S-1 registration documents paint a mixed picture. While the companies are all well positioned strategically, their end-user account totals prove that online banking is not yet a bona fide consumer hit. For example, NextCard with 66,0000 accounts, the most of any Net-only player , only approved 2.9% of 900,000 credit card applications it attracted in Q1 1999.
NextCard Approval Rates
|
Quarter |
Applications |
New Accounts |
Approval Rate |
| Q1 99 |
900,0 00 |
26,0 00 |
2.9 % |
| Q4 98 |
350,0 00 |
21,0 00 |
6.0 % |
| Q2/Q3 98 |
450,0 00 |
19,0 00 |
4.2 % |
| Total | 1.7 million |
66,0 00 |
3.9 % |
Source: company reports, 4/99
E-Loan, the exclusive mortgage provider on Yahoo!, turns out to be primarily a California phenomenon, booking 84% of its 1998 volume and 69% of Q1 ’99 volume in the home state.
E-Loan’s California Connection
|
State |
Number Loans Closed in 1998 |
Percent |
| California |
3,483 |
83% |
| Washington |
246 |
6% |
| Texas |
104 |
2% |
| Colorado |
78 |
2% |
| All Others |
275 |
7% |
| Total |
4,186 |
100% |
Source: company reports, 4/99
Online Resources and nFront, despite success in attracting bank clients, only have an average of 350 end-users for each live bank installation. In comparison, Wells Fargo is adding 10,000 new users every week (OBR 3/99).
nFront & Online Resources Client Bases
| Period Ending |
Banks Signed (cum.) |
Banks Launched (cum.) |
Total End-Users |
Users Per Bank1 |
% UsingOLB2 |
| nFront | |||||
|
6/30/97 |
5 |
2 |
357 |
179 |
unknown |
|
3/31/98 |
24 |
13 |
3,149 |
242 |
unknown |
|
6/30/98 |
40 |
19 |
5,240 |
276 |
unknown |
|
3/31/99 |
123 |
83 |
19,648 |
237 |
unknown |
| Online Resources | |||||
|
12/31/96 |
60 |
8 |
5,036 |
629 |
4.02% |
|
12/31/97 |
172 |
57 |
21,103 |
370 |
1.52% |
|
12/31/98 |
315 |
117 |
50,332 |
430 |
1.36% |
|
3/31/99 |
333 |
149 |
62,948 |
422 |
1.54% |
Source: company reports, 4/99
1Average calculated across launched banks only.
2Percent of bank customers at launched banks using online banking.
What does all this mean? Something you already know; it’s extremely difficult to attract new deposit and checking accounts on or off-line. The first Net bank, SFNB, still has only about 15,000 accounts after 3.5 years. NetBank, after 2.5 years of offering premium rates, has only 29,000 accounts. NextCard, who we think has one of the best Net financial services businesses in the country, has only 66,000 accounts, despite taking 1.7 million applications. And E-Loan with an exclusive and very prominent position on Yahoo!, only booked 703 loans outside of California during all of 1998, less than 60 per month.
This is great news for existing financial institutions. Your customers are “sticky” whether through loyalty or apathy. But don’t count on it to last. Your most profitably customers, the 30-to 45-year old, high income, high borrowing user is growing increasingly comfortable with ecommerce, and will head for the exits once the online players come up with more compelling product offerings.
IPO Scorecard
|
Consumer Companies |
Service Providers |
||||
| Metric |
NextCard1 |
E-Loan |
nFront |
ORCC |
Princeton eCom |
| Symbol |
NXCD |
EELN |
NFNT |
ORCC |
ECOM |
| The Buzz | 1.7 million loan applications; high mind share online | nearly $1 billion in loans in 1998; exclusive Yahoo! mortgage provider | came from nowhere to snag 123 client banks | has most banks signed (333) of any ebanking platform vendor | founded in 1984, on everyone’s short list for ebilling |
| The Reality | 3.9% approval rate results in only 66,000 accounts | only 17% of 1998 loans (probably less of the dollars) originated outside California; Yahoo provided just 14% of volume in Q1 99 | less than 20,000 end users across 83 banks for an average of 241 per bank | 63,000 end users across 149 banks for an average user base 422 per bank | only 14 clients using Internet billing services |
| Key Strategy Statement from Prospectus (S-1) | "...to redefine the banking experience for the Internet consumer." | "...to be the leading Internet-based provider of mortgages and debt-management services to consumers worldwide." | “…to be the leading provider of Internet banking products and services to the small to mid-sized bank market and to create Web-based financial destinations (for their customers).” | “…to become the leading provider of electronic commerce services to financial institutions by rapidly expanding and enhancing our hub.” | “…become a leading provider of Internet bill publishing and payment services.” |
| Current Products (Future Products) | Visa credit cards (FDIC-insured deposit greater than $100,000; retail banking services) |
home loans, first and second (debt-management vehicles and services such as loan monitoring) | consumer and business Net banking platforms | consumer home banking platforms: Web, dial-up, voice, screenphone; bill payment processing; patent licensing | ebilling and payment processing for billers and banks |
| Offering $/Date | $120 million/May 14 | $55 million/TBA | $49 million/TBA | $43 million/TBA | $33 million/TBA |
| Market Cap 1 | $1.3 billion (5/17/99) | $500 million | TBA | $152 million | $158 million |
| Founders (stake) | Molly & Jeremy Lent (9.6%) | Chris Larsen & Janina Pawlowski (33.5%) | Trip Rackley (30.8%) & his father Brady (29.7%) | Matthew P. Lawlor (13.2%) | Donald C. Licciardello (48.8%) |
| Employees |
135 |
251 |
71 |
203 |
84 (4/30/99) |
| Clients Signed (Launched) |
n/a |
n/a |
123 (83) |
333 (149) |
250+ |
| Total end users |
66,000 |
7,468 cumulative loans closed (6/97 to 3/99)2 |
19,648 |
62,948 |
unknown |
| Loan $ |
$96.3 million outstanding |
4,951 loans for $982 million closed in ‘98 |
n/a |
n/a |
n/a |
| 1998 Revenue |
$1.2 million |
$6.8 million |
$2.4 million |
$4.3 million |
$3.8 million |
| Rev/Acct |
$29.98 |
$1,380 |
$23,6005 |
$13,700 |
$15,2006 |
| 1998 Loss |
($16.1 million) |
($11.3 million) |
($1.2 million) |
($11.6 million) |
($3.3 million) |
| Q1 99 Revenue |
$1.9 million |
$4.1 million |
$1.0 million |
$1.5 million |
$1.1 million |
| Rev/Acct |
$28.56 |
$1,620 |
$8,200 |
$4,500 |
$4,6006 |
| Q4 98 Revenue |
$845,000 |
$3.0 million |
$1.2 million |
$1.4 million |
$1.2 million |
| Rev/Acct |
$21.12 |
$1,490 |
$12,0005 |
$4,400 |
$4,7006 |
| 1998 Marketing $ |
$4.3 million |
$5.6 million |
$1.2 million |
$3.4 million |
unknown |
| Acquisition cost3 |
$108.25 |
$1,130 |
$15,0005 |
$22,000 |
n/a |
| Q1 99 Marketing $ |
$2.6 million |
$3.6 million |
$774,000 |
$983,000 |
|
| Acquisition cost4 |
$98.27 |
$1,430 |
$34,0005 |
$55,000 |
|
| Notes: | Has 5,200 affiliates driving applicants to NextCard for $10 commission per approved account | Distribution partners (% of Q1 99 vol.): Yahoo (14%), E*Trade (2%), DLJ Direct (1%), CBS Market-Watch, Motley Fool, and Telebank get min. payments totaling $5.5 mil. in ‘99, most believed to go to Yahoo! where E-Loan is exclusive through Feb ‘01 | ORCC has two potentially lucrative patents one involving the bill payment process, the other safeguarding an online marketing technique | ||
Source: company reports, all figures as of 3/31/99 unless stated otherwise
Notes: (1) Market cap based on common stock outstanding after offering times maximum offering price in prospectus, except NextCard which is actual on 5/17/99; (2) Includes loan referrals; (3) Company also incurred $2.32 million in activation costs for another $58.00 per account, so acquisition costs might be better stated as $58.00 plus $108.25, or $166.25; (4) Company also incurred $1.52 million in activation costs for another $58.46 per account, so acquisition costs might be better stated as $58.46 plus $98.27 or $156.73; (5) Assuming company had 100 clients as of 12/31/98; (6) Assumes constant client base of 250.
Most Recent Posts:
- Citibank Helps Users Better Understand Prior Payment Activity When Paying Credit Card Bill Online - May 16, 2012

Leave a comment