« PayPal offers "eCommerce Safety Guide" | Main | ING Direct Fundraising ($320,000) for Tsunami »

Identity Theft Statistics from Javelin Research

By Jim Bruene on January 26, 2005 5:09 PM

Building on last year's FTC study, Javelin Strategy & Research and the Better Business Bureau, released the latest study of financial fraud and identity theft in the United States. A similar level of fraud was found in the late-2004 polling compared to the FTC survey fielded in mid-2003.

How_personal_information_stolen_click_toBoth studies found that just under 5% of U.S. adults, around 10 million, had been victimized in the prior 12 months, with total losses, primarily to financial institutions, of about $50 billion.

One of the major conclusions is that consumers are more likely to be victimized through offline methods compared to online methods, leading Javelin to conclude in their press release:

Internet-related fraud problems are actually less severe, less costly and not as widespread as previously thought.

However, this conclusion that is disputed in Bob Sullivan's MSNBC article by both Gartner's Avivah Litan and FTC attorney, Lois Greisman.

Here are the key findings:

How was your personal information obtained (i.e. stolen)?
     6%  via online methods
     36% via offline methods
     58% don't know

There are two ways to look at those numbers.

The Javelin take: Of those that know how it happened, offline identity theft outnumbers online identity theft 6-to-1, so let's not overstate the online threat.

The Gartner take: In consumer research, much of the online fraud will be self-reported in the "do not know" category, so the data is inconclusive. Avivah Litan says in the MSNBC article:

The general population doesn't really know how the information is stolen especially, with credit card fraud. If you do have a good guess, it usually is because you are in a fight with family member or neighbor. The study is biased towards people who know how it happened.

Our Take
Anytime you have a survey where the majority of participants select, "don't know," it is difficult to draw precise conclusions.

We think these results are promising for the fraud-fighting potential of the online channel, but they don't vindicate it either.

If you assume that the same 6-to-1 offline/online ratio applies to the "don't know" category, that means about 10% of last year's identity theft occurred via online methods, or 1 million cases costing $5 billion dollars.

Regardless of what the analysts say, that's a problem that needs fixing.

-- JB

Resources:

 

Comments (0)
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Most Recent Posts:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, please note that we will read your comment before it is approved to go up on the blog. However, we'd prefer that you and our other readers didn't have to wait. If you'd like your comments to appear instantly in the future, you can create a TypeKey account and we'll set you up as a trusted commenter!)


Please enter the security code you see here

Sponsors

Finovate 2008 - Come see the future of finance & banking!


Sponsored Links

Events

Research

  • NEW! Online Investing Communities: Will social networking revolutionize saving & investing?- Find out more
  • NEW! Searching for Customers 3.0: Search engine marketing for financial institutions- Find out more
  • Person-to-Person Lending 2.0: Disruptive service or market niche? - Find out more
  • Mobile Money and Payments: Why credit & debit card issuers should embrace mobile delivery now - Find out more

Products & Services

  • Compare CD (certificate of deposit) interest rates and read customer reviews at Bankaholic