| By Jim Bruene on May 6, 2008 9:54 AM | Comments (4) |
In an unscientific poll of 500 Facebook users (see note 1), we found that 13% of respondents are interested in accessing their bank balance through their Facebook account (red bar below).
Source: Online Banking Report, 9 April 2008, n = 500
While that's not exactly a ringing endorsement of the idea, it's potentially enough early adopters to get the service rolling. Most of the interest emanated from younger segments. For example, 18% of 18-to-24 year-olds said they'd probably use Facebook banking (gray bar below) compared to about 5% of the 25-49 group (green and yellow bars below).
Source: Online Banking Report, 9 April 2008, n = 500
But it will take education to move "Facebook banking" into the mainstream. The majority of respondents, 70%, said there is "no way" they'd bank within Facebook and another 13% said probably not, resulting in a strong 83% negative rating. Given well-founded concerns surrounding online security, that's not surprising.
For more information:
- See previous posts on Facebook banking apps from mShift and Galaxy
- See Online Banking Report on Social Personal Finance
Note:
1. Survey was conducted April 9 through Facebook's polling mechanism. Total respondents = 500. Respondents are self-selected so the results should not be used to forecast specific demand.
Most Recent Posts:



v2.gif)

Interesting but scary.
I've had an ATM card since 1978, and have been an early adopter of online banking etc.
Banking from Facebook seems scary to me. They're a known quantity, however, not that well trusted!!
Thanks for this! Great information.
Thanks for this valuable information. The 70% who say "no way" would they use Facebook to view their bank account balance is more of a statement on Facebook than on the role social networking can (and I might argue, already does) play in banking. I can see Facebook eventually stemming the inherent weaknesses the data evidenced. That would certainly help Facebook -- and banking consumers alike. But it will be a challenge for Facebook. Facilitating greater security implies putting more limitations on usage. I am not sure such limitations synch with Facebook's goals, at least in the near-term.
I wonder if this is still relevant. If It's 70% still - or not?