« FinovateSpring 2012 -- Save Big with a Super Early-Bird Ticket! | Main | Square Looks to Have Secured the Square.com Domain »

Op Ed: Rise of the Feenix

By Jim Bruene on January 19, 2012 5:23 PM | Comments (2)

by Michael Nuciforo

Editor's note: This post was written by Michael Nuciforo, a Mobile Banking Consultant at Keatan. He previously worked at ANZ on a number of developments, including goMoney, and more recently was Head of Mobile Banking at RBS managing the UK Retail portfolio.

image Banks has perfected what I refer to as the ‘negative pricing model.’ In simple terms, fees are charged when customers make mistakes. We are all familiar with it. It is the annoying cost of returning a DVD late, or staying too long in your parking space.

At present, banks rely significantly on revenue generated from fees when customers fall afoul of their terms and conditions. Amongst all the doom and gloom of regulatory pressure, the euro debt crises, and record low margins, could mobile banking be the right service to implement a ‘positive pricing model’?

Tiered charges for access to additional features and content have become common due to the popularity of games such as FarmVille and Sims. This is great news for banks as the market has likely reached the right point of innovation, access and acceptance to allow for the monetization of mobile banking.

Now that most banks have launched first-generation mobile services, new features are perfect for tiered pricing. Areas such as NFC payments and remote deposit-capture are a great place to start. They are tangibly more convenient than existing processes, and are designed to leverage the specific capabilities of a mobile device.

But can banks pull this off? Or will it just be seen as yet another annoying banking fee?

When implementing a pricing model, banks need to be clear about their strategy and objectives. For the model to work, it is critical that unique, mobile-specific services are delivered to warrant the cost. And banks shouldn’t charge for services that they already offer for free today. This will only anger existing users. They should also avoid charging for services available in other channels for free, although some exceptions could apply. Banks need pricing that is fair, transparent and that rewards loyalty as well.

Any new fee will disappoint some customers. Banks should also expect negative media attention at first. This will happen any time bank and fee are included in the same sentence. Banks need to be proactive about engaging regulators during the process and communicating actively to customers. It is important that fees are integrated seamlessly into the customer journey. Regular enhancements should also be made to the service. Success will ultimately rely on the quality of new features.

With traditional revenue streams under attack, and investment in mobile growing, pressure will come on mobile leaders to justify the costs. The honeymoon period for mobile banking will be tested at some stage. Customer retention and transaction migration are fine, but are they enough for your senior executives? And can they be accurately proven?

With customers now familiar with this pricing model in other facets of their everyday life, it is important that banks also take the opportunity to do this now. Otherwise mobile banking, like online banking, will become a free channel for life.

Comments (2)

Most Recent Posts:

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.netbanker.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/2626

2 Comments

I'd love this. It will spell the demise of the traditional retail bank, and the rise of the fully online bank. Why? Because it's silly to charge for mobile banking (a significanlty lower cost delivery channel than almost any other). So start charging for high-use, low-efficiency channels like branch visits and the call center. ATMs, too (oh, they already do that). The result: the low expense, internet-only model of Bank of Internet, ING Direct, BankSimple, Betterment, etc. will enjoy the outflow from the feenix.

A 'positive pricing model' for banks seems like a good idea in theory. The most critical aspect for banks introducing fees will come in the execution. The value the customer will derive by paying a fee for a service needs to be very transparent. If there isn't value, or if the customer does not perceive there is value, customers will be disgruntled regardless of the positive intent.

Leave a comment

Sponsors

BackBase IntelliResponse Yodlee FinovateEurope 2012

Events

  • FinovateEurope 2012 -- On February 7th, 2012, the second annual FinovateEurope will feature dozens of Europe's newest fintech innovations via a fast-paced demo-only format in the financial capital of London. 7 minutes each on stage. No slides allowed. Come watch the future of fintech in Europe unfold live! Get your ticket today and lock in your spot before it is too late!
  • FinovateSpring 2012 -- On May 8th & 9th, 2012, Finovate will return to San Francisco for our 5th annual west coast showcase of the newest fintech innovations from Silicon Valley and beyond. Each company gets 7 minutes to demo live. No slides allowed. Come watch the future of fintech debut! Get your ticket today and save big!

Research

  • NEW! Online & Mobile Banking Forecast: Current, future and historical usage: 1994 to 2021 - Find out more
  • NEW! Selling Insurance Online (Banking Edition): Can insurance help fill the fee-income gap? - Find out more
  • NEW! True Virtual Banking Has Arrived: BankSimple, Personal Capital, Betterment and others go branchless, paperless and “bank-less” - Find out more
  • 2012 Guide to Online & Mobile Banking Products, Pricing & Strategy: Preparing for a mobile-first world - Find out more
  • Family Banking: Tweens, Teens & their Parents: In a remote banking world, your most-promising prospects aren’t even driving yet! - Find out more

 

   

RSS Subscribe via RSS
RSS Subscribe to Comments



Email:


@NetBanker Twitter Feed



See all @NetBanker tweets