Stories from our Finovate blog cover some of the most innovative financial companies in the world. More alumni news is available on our Finovate Twitter feed.

BancVue Acquires Financial Literacy Company Skill-Life

In its first corporate acquisition, BancVue purchased fellow Finovate alum Skill-Life, a company that produces interactive games that promote financial literacy. The purchase price was not disclosed. BancVue expects to make more acquisitions and strategic partnerships in the future.

Skill-Life produces customizable game platforms where children can earn real-world rewards as incentives in games that teach financial skills. Skill-Life licenses its platforms to financial institutions, enabling them to add their own branding to the game environment (full post here).

Billeo Adds Bing to Offer Assistant

Billeo has added Microsoft Bing to the list of search engines supporting its Offer Assistant product. Partnering with Bing gives Billeo the top-three players in the Internet search market (it already works with Yahoo! and Google), representing about 97% of U.S. searches.

Offer Assistant helps consumers take advantage of incentives and rewards from credit or debit cards while using search engines to shop online. Billeo's partnership with Microsoft adds Bing's cash-back rewards program to the service (full post here).

Credit Karma Launches New Dashboard Tool

Consumer credit information provider Credit Karma has launched a new feature that provides targeted offers to visitors at its site. The feature, called the Ways to Save Dashboard, draws on information provided by visitors to anonymously shop for and present financial products offers.

With its new Dashboard feature, the Credit Karma site automates the complex process of researching new loans, credit cards, saving accounts, and other financial products (full post  here).

Syphr's RateMatch system was designed to help credit unions find new members and loan customers. Syphr generates revenue by charging financial institutions when prospective clients click on a link to contact the institution. According to Syphr, the RateMatch engine has processed more than 5,000 reports, with an average loan payment savings of $239 per month.

Syphr's newest innovation is MoreThanACreditReport.com, a credit reporting website with targeted loan information. It's designed to help consumers save by comparing their current loans to those offered by Syphr's affiliated banks and credit unions. Instead of offering just the credit report, the company provides money-saving loan deals. The site launched January 14, 2010 (press release here).

Although the site emphasizes a free credit report, MoreThanACreditReport charges users $14.95/month after a seven-day free trial (see screenshot below; highlighting has been added).

As part of that membership fee, the site's customers get access to other Syphr products including monthly credit monitoring, a credit report every six months, and Syphr's Payment Patrol system, which allows customers to receive notifications of better loan options as interest rates change.

How MoreThanACreditReport.com Works:

1. Consumers register at the MoreThanACreditReport.com site to get their credit report.

2. The site uses the consumer's Zip code to display average loan rates for the local area.

3. Next, using the consumer's credit card information, the site pulls an Experion credit report using a soft pull that does not show as an inquiry on the borrower's credit file.

4. Syphr's RateMatch technology analyzes the user's existing loans and searches for better deals available from affiliated financial institutions in their local area. RateMatch is powered by DataTrac, one of the largest interest rate databases in the United States.

5. The site shows the comparison to the consumer, highlighting where they can save money by refinancing or switching loans. In the example below, Eastern New York FCU is identified as a place that could save the user $60 per month.

If there are no participating financial institutions in the consumer's local area, they are given a RateTrac report, which compares the consumer's loans against the average payment plans offered by loan providers in the area. If the report shows that the consumer is paying more than the local average, the consumer can use the data to help negotiate lower rates.

6. If there are participating lenders available, the website allows consumers to contact the lenders directly simply by clicking on the "exchange it" button. Lenders automatically receive the customer's contact details and credit info.

7. Clicking on an offer on the MoreThanACreditReport site does not constitute a firm offer of credit. The bank or credit union follows up to arrange the actual loan. Because the loan information presented by the website is based on the consumer's credit report, it is likely to be representative of what the participating bank will offer.

My take: Saving money on loans is one of the key reasons people check their credit reports. Syphr says that more than 175,000 people check their credit reports online each month. As a lead-generation system for financial institutions, MoreThanACreditReport.com has the advantage of putting loan offers in front of consumers at the precise time they are thinking about a new loan. 

The MoreThanACreditReport.com site

RateMatch Offers Loan Savings

Online mortgage startup Home-Account has licensed the refinance.com domain name and today launched a new, free service for people seeking to refinance their homes (press release).

The domain name was formerly that of Homebridge Mortgage Bankers Corporation, which had acquired the name for more than $700,000 in 2005. But in the 2008 mortgage meltdown, Homebridge went out of business and the valuable domain name went unused throughout 2009.

Home-Account is a 2009 Finovate alum (video here and here) specializing in helping consumers navigate the confusing mortgage marketplace. The startup uses an online system to assess a home loan applicant's suitability before they apply. It then provides advice and assistance in finding the best mortgage. The company contracts with mortgage lenders to provide firm price quotes at the end of the process. Lenders pay Home-Account a fixed fee for each mortgage.

The startup has enlisted noted mortgage finance expert Jack Guttenberg, also known as the Mortgage Professor (link) to endorse the service.

How it works:

1. To begin the process, simply enter a Zip code.

2. Complete a three-part online application detailing personal financial info (including social security number), info on existing mortgages, and a short "mortgage personality" quiz to help match buyer needs with mortgage options (e.g., fixed vs. variable rate).

3. Confirm identity using info from credit files.

4. Home-Account then pulls a credit report using a soft pull that does not show as an inquiry on the borrower's credit file.

5. The site provides a loan-eligibility score, a few quick tips on improving credit qualifications, and firm loan offers including rates and all fees from qualified lenders. The borrower reviews the various offers side-by-side, a feature that should provoke healthy competition among the lenders.

6. If the borrower decides to move forward, they click on their desired loan to lock in the offered rate.

7. The selected lender then closes the loan directly with the borrower.

At launch, several lenders are offering loans through the system including: GoodMortgage.com, RoundPoint Mortgage Company, Eagle National Bank and First Choice Funding.

Analysis: The mortgage shopping and refinance process is still a mystery to a large percentage of consumers. It is difficult to compare prices while shopping, and the myriad of fees tacked on during the process can leave a bad taste with the borrower. Consumers rarely know if they truly received a fair deal when all is said and done. The Home-Account/Refinance.com solution promises to add more transparency during the entire mortgage process. That's welcome news to scandal-weary American consumers.

However, convincing skeptical consumers to trust its mortgage-recommendation engine will be a major challenge for Home-Account. Third-party endorsements, and possible integration with financial institutions or personal finance tool providers, will be vitally important.

Refinance.com #1 - The site grades loan eligibility ...

Refinance.com #2 - ... and suggest ways to improve it.

Thanks to information in LendingTree's lawsuit (embedded below) against its rate-engine provider, Mortech (see note 1), which was picked up by the NY Times, then echoed across the Internet, Google appears to be looking at providing loan rate comparison/aggregation directly in its search results. The service appears to have been beta-tested in the UK more than a year ago (screenshots here).

It's no surprise Google would make this move. It's long worked on ways to help online shoppers compare products and services. For example, a search today on "air conditioner" displays the usual targeted text ads on the top and right, but also shows various "shopping results" in the middle of the page (see screenshot below). There are even catalogue-like thumbnails in the right-hand column, something I'd not noticed before.

Financial services, with heavy search volumes, are an obvious area for expansion by the search giant.

The LendingTree lawsuit says the service may launch within the next 30 days. Google says only that it is "currently working on a small ad unit test that will run against a limited number of mortgage-related search queries in the U.S."

What it means to NetBankers: The service, if successful, could help users streamline their rate-research process by eliminating a visit to a loan-comparison site. But it's not likely to have a material impact on banks, credit unions and other mortgage lenders. There will just be more advertising dollars ending up in Google's pocket at the expense of other financial lead-gen sites such as BankRate.com, Interest.com and LendingTree, of course.

LendingTree complaint

Search results for "air conditioner" (27 Aug 2009, 3 PM Pacific, from Seattle IP address)

Note:
1. LendingTree claims that Mortech, an info provider to LendingTree, would be in violation of its contract if it provided similar technology to Google. See LendingTree's press release on the matter.

It's so refreshing to have some real numbers to go on, even if they are self reported. Aside from Prosper, Lending Club (here), and most recently SmartyPig (here), few of the startups we track provide meaningful metrics on their operations. That's why we use Compete website traffic estimates as a proxy for success.

Yesterday, MoneyAisle, the reverse-deposit-auction marketplace from neoSaej, released the following results for fourth quarter 2008 (press release): 

• $1.65 billion in auctions run by consumers, up three-fold from Q3 2008 (note 1)
• $100 million in deposits generated

That's not a lot, but we can make a few estimates from that info (note 2):

• Assuming 80 active bank partners, the average take per bank in Q4 was $1.25 million
• But applying the 80/20 rule to those results means that 16 banks generated about $80 million in deposits, or $5 million each
• And conversely, the remaining 64 banks brought in just $300,000 each
• Assuming the average deposit balance auctioned was $20,000, five thousand separate auction winners funded a deposit
• Assuming a commission of $37 per funded auction (note 2), neoSaej would have generated $185,000 in commission income in Q4, this is in addition to license fees and monthly maintenance fees

And for those of you who still want traffic numbers, MoneyAisle's website usage (monthly unique visitors) has been trending upwards after suffering a post-launch dip in November. In December, visitors totaled just under 20,000. 

Bottom line: It's a promising start for the company which earned an OBR Best of the Web this summer, was picked by the audience as Best of Show in October's Finovate (video here), and was recently chosen as a top-10 innovation of the year in our most recent Online Banking Report (here).

When MoneyAisle adds integrated online account opening (powered by Andera), results should be even stronger. 

Notes:
1. Deposit-generated total is 6% of total auctions run, because consumers are not obligated to make the deposit after they run the auction.

2. My speculative estimates, not provided from the company.

3. We outlined the company in a June blog post and in the pages of our Online Banking Report on New Models for Lead Generation and Online Banking Report on Growing Deposits in the Digital Age. 

In the early commercial Web era (1995 to 1998), five financial startups inspired me in terms of their innovative products and services: 

• E-Loan for mortgage
• E*Trade for stock brokerage
• Netbank for deposit-taking
• NextCard for credit cards
• LendingTree for lead generation

These were my go to companies for ideas and inspiration when covering the space in the mid-to-late 1990s. In those days, traditional financial institutions were just getting started and were not as far along in features and functionality. 

Sadly, two of the five have failed, NextCard in 2002 (here) and NetBank in 2007 (here). And the other three are struggling through the credit crisis.

The latest downer: This week, E-Loan, owned by Banco Popular, announced its exit from the online mortgage origination business. Reading the headlines, I first thought they'd thrown in the towel altogether. But it turns out they are discontinuing only direct mortgage originations. The company will continue to use its popular website (see traffic below) to attract potential borrowers who are handed off to other lenders, something it already does today for student, auto, personal and business loans, along with credit cards. This is a potentially lucrative fee-based business with zero credit risk.

It's a cautionary tale of how critical, and difficult, the execution piece is. These were industry darlings, always in the news and at the top of the search results. Yet, in financial services especially, you have to temper innovation with prudent underwriting and business practices. All three were brought down by credit-related problems. 

E-Loan traffic has stabilized at around 250,000 uniques per month:

Next up is MoneyAisle from NeoSaej. Mukesh Chatter, president & CEO, will demonstrate.

The Burlington, MA-based company launched its auction-based deposit service this summer.

MoneyAisle demonstrated a reverse auction for a CD with a winning bid of 4% APY by Commerce State Bank. The company emphasized that it's fully transparent with no ads, and the consumer can choose at the end whether they want to accept the bid and purchase the deposit.

The first demo of the afternoon is from George Favvas, co-founder and CEO of SmartHippo.

SmartHippo is a mortgage-loan marketplace that combines user-generated content with rate information scraped by SmartHippo bots, and received directly from lenders themselves. SmartHippo was a presenter in Finovate Startup last April.

SmartHippo is launching a new rate engine later this month that has more than 200 lenders. They are concentrating on mortgages today, but are looking at other verticals in the future.

Article updated at 2 PM Pacific with quote from one of Zopa's partner CUs, Affinity Plus. 

Zopa's U.S. social deposit/lending site will be shuttered, just 10 months after its launch (see previous coverage here). The site, which delivered loan applications and CD customers to six credit union partners, apparently was closed by Zopa. At this point the exact reason is unclear (see update below). Zopa blamed the U.S. credit situation and said it wanted to concentrate its efforts in other markets. 

Here's part of the statement from CEO Doug Dolton that appeared on the Zopa forum earlier today (also here's the official blog entry at Zopa UK):

The facts are: Due to the extremely difficult consumer credit circumstances in the US, we made the decision to focus our ongoing efforts in the UK, Italy and Japan. We have six credit union partners in the US, and we have been working with them to modify our business model to offer our customers the best possible offerings, given the poor credit conditions in the US.

We're certainly facing unprecedented economic times worldwide right now, but I am pleased to report that our UK and Italian operations are doing better than ever, and I look forward to continuing to develop those marketplaces. I apologise for any confusion regarding our circumstances.

As of this morning, the Zopa US homepage is unchanged, but you can no longer sign up as a new member and all the Learn More links redirect to USA Federal Credit Union. 

Implications
It's surprising that the company would throw in the towel on the significant investment it made here. However, if Zopa's CU lending partners had curtailed, or stopped, making loans through the site, something noticed last week by the Prosper Lending Review blog, the whole strategy would no longer be viable (see update below).

But this has nothing to do with what Prosper, Loanio (which launched last week) and hopefully Lending Club (expected be accepting new lenders shortly) are doing with person-to-person lending. Zopa US, unlike Zopa UK, was NOT a P2P lending site, it was a lead-generation site for six credit unions. When those CUs stopped needing loan-leads due to the credit crunch, it took the legs out from under the U.S. division. Even continuing to just take deposits made no sense, since each depositor was required to assist a borrower by gifting a portion of the deposit interest.

We wouldn't be surprised to see Zopa back in United States in the future as a true P2P lending site, copying the model of its U.K. and Italian divisions. The social aspect of its offering certainly resonated with consumers and industry players as well. The company was one of four Best of Show winners in our April Finovate Startup conference, an award by majority vote from the audience (video here).

For more information, see our Online Banking Report on Person-to-Person Lending. And those attending our Finovate next week will see two companies demo P2P lending. 

Update: 2 PM PDT, 9 Oct 2008

As one of the credit unions who were partnered with Zopa, I would like to clarify that we have no credit availability issues and have changed none of our lending practices. This decision was made by Zopa.

-- Sarah Mason, SVP, Affinity Plus Credit Union

Providing free credit scores in exchange for viewing a credit card offer seems like a reasonable value exchange (see note 1). That's why we gave Credit Karma our OBR Best of the Web award in August and why it is on stage next week at Finovate (see previous coverage here, video at Finovate Startup here). 

It's also no surprise that others would try the same model. Credit crisis or not, credit-worthy borrowers are still a valuable commodity. Case in point, Bankaholic's recent acquisition by BankRate for a reported $15 million, or $50 per unique visitor (Mashable post here).

The latest entry in free-credit-score lead generation is KnowBeforeYouApply (KBYA) from Centrro, a financial-search company founded in 2006 by Ike Eze and Tuyen Vo. Eze was a founder of QSpace, an OBR Best of the Web winner in 1997 when it became the first company to make credit reports available online (archived OBR article here). QSpace was acquired by Experian several years later.

KnowBeforeYouApply launched on Sept. 3, but was put on the map with Mr. Eze's post today in The Huffington Post entitled, "Stay Away from Me, Credit Card Crisis" (see note 2). The article discusses the value of tracking your credit score and using that knowledge to find the best credit offers. Eze mentions his company along with Credit Karma, Quizzle from Quicken Loans, two other Finovate presenters, Mint and BillShrink.

Using KnowBeforeYouApply.com
It would be difficult to make the site any easier to use. Customers type in their name, address, email address, and last four digits of their social security number. Apparently, that's all that's needed to access your credit file and return a letter grade of A through F.

The whole process takes about 30 seconds (there is no need to enter an entire social security number), and KBYA steers clear of those pesky out-of-wallet authentication questions. Users can get an update of their credit grade every 90 days. In comparison, Credit Karma, which provides an exact 3-digit credit score, will update it daily if the user so desires.

KBYA also has a simple and intuitive sales platform. Just two offers were highlighted in the main screen, one from Chase and one from American Express (see first screenshot below). However, clicking through to "see all offers" led to 25 pages of credit cards, displayed five to a page (121 total for A-grade credit). A handy index along the sidebar allows users to find various categories that most appeal to them such as "travel rewards" or "0% intro rate" cards (see second screenshot).

KBYA appears to use the API from CardOffers.com to build a portion of its database of card offers. CardOffers.com offers its affiliates up to $20 per application or up to $160 per approved application. KBYA also appears to be an affiliate of Credit.com and Discover Card (see note 3).

The site is focused solely on credit cards for now. But a Home Loan tab is built into the user interface, with a "coming soon" label.

Analysis
All in all, it's a good service. The site needs to beef up its FAQs, About Us, and other educational materials so users can better understand who is behind the service and what exactly the credit grade means. But as a month-old beta service, it's presumably coming.

While I prefer the precision and peace of mind of seeing my actual credit score, a letter grade every 90 days will be sufficient for many users and should help keep costs down. And the speed of the application process and lack of social security number are real benefits.

Financial institution opportunities
Banks, credit unions, and card issuers should consider offering similar functionality both inside online banking, where private info would already be known, and on the outside where prospective loan customers could use it. With info about the customer's credit grade, lenders could deliver tailored offers that could lead to increased application volume and approval rates. See our recent Online Banking Report for more info on lead generation sites (note 1). 

Know Before You Apply main page after login (7 Oct 2008)

KnowBeforeYouApply all-offers page (7 Oct 2008)

Notes:
1. For a thorough discussion of the topic, see our August 2008 Online Banking Report on New Models for Lead Generation.

2. Strangely, the article doesn't specifically disclose Mr. Eze's affiliation with Know Before You Apply, although clicking on his name does show he's CEO of Centrro. However, it's left to the reader to discover on their own that Centrro is the parent of Know Before You Apply. Hopefully, that oversight will be corrected.

3. The affiliate relationships are inferred from the redirects that take place when clicking on the Apply Now arrow.

4. This is one of the ten online finance companies that launched in Sept. (post here).

FirstROI, a division of Austin, TX-based BancVue (previous coverage here) launched its CheckingFinder service June 2. FinovateStartup attendees received a sneak peak in April and rewarded it with a Best of Show award (video here). The innovative service helps consumers find the best BancVue-powered rewards checking account based on geographic location, APY, or total return (see second screenshot below).

How it Works
The first challenge is getting customers to the site. FirstROI is investing heavily in Google AdWords to get the word out. For example, a search on "checking accounts" at Google today (note 1), displayed CheckingFinder in second place, trailing only BofA (see screenshot below).

As a relative newcomer to AdWords, the company's bid price would have to be high to score the second slot over such big names as Schwab (#3), HSBCdirect (#4), Key Bank (#5), WaMu (#6), Chase (#10) and Wells Fargo (#11). CheckingFinder may very well be paying more than BofA, depending on how Google's ad-positioning algorithm weighs its relevance.

Clicking the AdWords link results in a list of banks presorted by closest distance to the IP address used to search Google (see next screenshot). Unfortunately, the closest participating BancVue client, Altra Federal Credit Union, is 1043 miles away
(see note 2).

You can also sort the results by rate (APY) or plug in an estimated checking account balance and ATM usage and have the results sorted by highest annual return
(see note 3).

After selecting the account you prefer, users land on a page that lays out the offer in more detail and includes a bright green "open now" bar at the bottom of the page and another open button in the webpage bullseye, the upper-right corner. The online account opening process is powered by Andera.

Summary
Overall, it's a good "micro" search engine, helping users quickly find the best checking account from the company's client base. The big downside from a consumer perspective is that it's currently limited to just 60 participating BancVue reward-checking clients. It will be more effective if they can get more of their 400+ banks and credit unions on board.

While I think most consumers will understand that they are searching a subset of available checking accounts, I think BancVue should disclose a bit more about its relationship with the financial institutions listed. That fact is touched on in the About Us section, but the FAQs don't address this, nor are there any direct links back to BancVue or FirstROI. 

Notes:

1. Google search conducted from Seattle IP address at 1 PM Pacific time, 17 June 2008.

2. Verity Credit Union, which is about 4 miles from my home, is a BancVue client, but their reward-checking account, Velocity Checking, is currently paying a short-term teaser rate of 6.75% to celebrate its 75th anniversary (APY updated 20 June per Shari's comment). When Verity returns to its normal 5% APY, its account will be available through CheckingFinder. There is also a slightly closer California bank participating, Tri Counties Bank, but it is not marketing to Seattle residents, so I don't see it in my CheckingFinder results page.  

3. Jeffry Pilcher, who recently left Weber Marketing to found his own consultancy, ICONiQ, is also blogging at The Financial Brand. He cautions that the days of differentiating your brand with "reward checking" has passed in many markets.

I've been reading the FiLife blog and monitoring its URL since I heard about the intriguing concept last summer. After a couple false starts, the site went live yesterday.

The unique joint effort between News Corp's Dow Jones and IAC is a cross between a personal finance tool like those powered by LeadFusion, a finance forum like FatWallet, a voting site such as Digg, and a full-blown magazine such as Money. It's dripping with Web 2.0 touches from the trendy design to blogging with attitude and harnessing the collective intelligence of the user base.

The core FI Deals area shown below allows users to self-assess their financial situations. In FiLife-speak, it shows how you stack up, in key areas such as income, home value, credit score, debt and even the value of your car. The people pyramid (in the screenshot below) shows an orange stick figure representing where you stand against the rest of the country.

Following a few ideas on how to improve your standing, FiLife presents financial deals in descending order of how valuable the FiLife community deems them. In this case, a mortgage offer from Citibank is listed first due to its top-of-the-line 5-point score. In this case, since it's the first day the site's been live, the score comes from a single review by a FiLife staffer. As the site gains users, this score would reflect the average across all reviewers.

The other key area is the FiDeals (screenshot below). Here users can search the top deals across all categories as voted on by the community. Some deals have been placed in the site via sponsorship dollars. Those are indicated by the gold pyramid. Blue pyramid offers have been added by staff members. In either case, the score shown within the colored pyramid reflects the vote of the community, which includes staff member votes.

First Impressions
The deep-pocketed owners have the resources to build traffic and establish the FiLife brand, if they find it profitable. Assuming it gets significant visitor traction, this could be the place to find financial and banking deals online, at least in the United States.

The business model is clearly ad-supported. There's nothing on the site at this point that would command subscription fees. And so far, the advertising is less intrusive than many other financial portals. And the bright look and good organization, not to mention professional personal finance content, add up to a potential winner.

But FiLife faces the same problem all ad-supported personal finance sites have: how to walk the fine line between the needs of users who want to find the best price vs. that of the advertisers that do not want to compete solely on price. FiLife sponsors may bolt if the community consistently posts poor reviews on their price-value. On the other hand, Google is dong just fine with AdWords, by ensuring that advertising is relevant. It will be interesting to see how FiLife strikes the proper balance.  

And it's no sure thing that FiLife ends up as the winner in the space. FiLife faces competition not only from startups such as SmartHippo, Wesabe, and Mint, but also from entrenched sites such as BankRate and TheStreet.com. And don't count out the incumbent personal finance magazines, including Dow Jones's own SmartMoney. These properties have enormous brand recognition and have already built substantial websites.

If you were to sit down with a blank piece of paper and design the perfect friction-free system for determining deposit rates, your invention would almost certainly include some type of competitive bidding. Over the years we've seen several banks test eBay-style auctions including PNC Bank, WaMu, and most recently Zions Direct. Those incorporated a traditional auction model, with the bank putting a deposit up for auction and selling it to the highest bidding consumer.

The latest entrant into auction-style finance, is MoneyAisle, a deposit marketplace from neoSaej, that launched today. MoneyAisle employs a reverse auction, where the consumer offers to buy an item, in this case a deposit of a certain size, and sellers bid against each other to offer the best price, in this case the highest interest rate.

In theory, MoneyAisle comes closest to the perfect deposit-pricing model. It's right out of the Economics 101 textbook. If they can get enough buyers and sellers to make it work, it could cause a serious disruption in the market for so-called high-yield savings accounts and certificates of deposit (CDs).

I really like the auction model, but there are some obstacles for it to overcome on its way to market dominance. Here are a few that come to mind: 

1. How to convince users that it's in their best interest to take the rate offered at the end of the auction? The first thing I did after seeing the 3.1% offer was to type in www.ingdirect.com and see how it compared. And given that ING was just a bit less, 3.0%, it's hard to get excited about opening a new account with an unknown bank for just 10 more basis points. Or worse yet, type "high yield savings rates" into Google and see five advertisers that can beat the 3.1% (see Google screenshot below).

2. How to make the auction's feel "real?" It seems like a game, which is not necessarily bad. Users choose a deposit product, $ amount, and their state of residence, then spin the dial. Then in real time you watch the results as banks bid against each other for your money (see Step 2 screenshot below). Then after 60 seconds or so, the winner is displayed (see Step 3 screenshot below) and you can proceed to make your deposit, provided you are satisfied with the rate and the bank making the offer. 

3. How to keep one bank from dominating the bidding? If the lowest-cost bank, or the one most skilled at cross-selling, or the one most in need of deposits, consistently bids "above-market" rates, will the remaining banks stay in the game?

4. How do you compete with the offers available via Google AdWords, another type of auction (see below)?

How it Works
After registering with a bare minimum of info (username, password, and security question only), it's a simple three-step process that couldn't be easier:

1. Decide whether you want a high-yield savings account or a CD (see step 1, screenshot below)

2. Start the auction (see step 2, screenshot below) and participating banks bid in real time via a preprogrammed, proxy bidding system

3. A few minutes later, accept the winning rate and arrange for account opening with the winning bank (see step 3, screenshot below)

In testing today, 51 banks bid on my high-yield savings account (at just after midnight Pacific Time) and 72 bid on a 1-year CD (at 5 PM Pacific Time). We were offered identical 3.1% APYs for a $5,000 savings account in Washington state and a $50,000 one in New York. When we ran an actual savings-account auction after registering, the winning bidder was Massachusetts-based Beverly National Bank with again, a 3.1% rate (see note 1). A $25,000 1-year CD in Washington earned a top bid of 3.90% by Michigan-based Isabella Bank, similar to the best rate advertised on Google.

MoneyAisle step 1: Choose a deposit product

Step 2: Watch as banks go through several rounds of bidding to reach the final rate

Step 3: Confirm you want the rate within 30 minutes and complete the rest of the form; the winning bank then contacts the customer to complete the transaction

Note:

1. The bank's bid was more than double its published rate for a $20,000 deposit. But Beverly does currently pay 3.0% APY on $100,000 balances. When I reran the auction at 5PM Pacific Time, the bid was 30 basis points higher, 3.4% from Umbrella Bank.

Many financial institutions sell or auction repossessed vehicles to the public. However, not many use this by-product of installment lending as a prospecting tool on their homepage.

We came across this novel approach at Houston Federal Credit Union <houstonfcu.org> while putting together a presentation titled "Extreme Website Makeovers" for an upcoming American Bankers Associate conference. The first place we looked for inspiration was the client list of Trabian, a talented new website designer concentrating on the credit union market (grab a feed to their outstanding blog, OpenSourceCU here). 

Trabian's client, HFCU, includes a link to its vehicle auctions on the right-side of its homepage (see screenshot below). Clicking on the box takes users to the main auction page where any registered user may bid on the vehicle (in this case, just a single motorcycle was up for auction).   

Analysis
Everyone loves a good deal, and unlike retailers who can drop a loss-leader on their homepage to generate excitement, financial institutions have far fewer options. Vehicle auctions provide an interesting way to encourage members to check back periodically to see if they could get a smoking hot deal on a used sedan, truck, or bass boat.

It's also a good prospecting tool. Nonmembers are allowed to register on the site and bid. This provides the credit union an immediate opportunity to make a sales pitch such as the "Wish your auto loan was at HFCU instead?" in the center of the page.

The email address supplied by the bidder also enables the CU to market to the nonmember in future emails. Finally, anyone who buys the auctioned vehicle is a great candidate for an HFCU loan, which are positioned in the upper-right of the auction page (see screenshot below).

Making it even better
We love the idea, and it works well even in its relatively simple form. It would be even better with a few additions:

1. It would drive even more traffic with an email and RSS feed option for receiving information on new auction items and for monitoring bids.
2. The credit union would generate more interest by including a variety of vehicles (even if they bought a few at auction to seed the site). Today's sole entry was a 2005 Suzuki motorcycle with a buy-it-now price of $6300.
3. The auction format and tools are relatively crude by today's standards. For example, it wasn't obvious who the other bidders were, how long it had been up for auction, or what the next bid needed to be. There are numerous auction services that could provide a more eBay-like experience.
4. It would be helpful to integrate the auction more closely with the loan center so users could easily calculate monthly payments, insurance costs, etc.

One of the goals of online marketing, especially financial services marketing where consumers may not be comfortable submitting personal data over the Web, is generating leads. According to LeadFusion <leadfusion.com>, the parent of Financenter, the leading financial calculator provider, there are four steps to good online lead generation:

The last step, ACTIVATE, is the key to identifying sales leads. While most major financial institutions have financial calculators available online, how many of them are used to capture leads? Since most customers will not put up with a registration process BEFORE using the calculator, you must entice users to identify themselves at the end of the calculations.

Some common methods:

• Subscribe to an information alert: Users sign up to receive email messages when certain events occur, such as rates hitting a certain level; for example, E*Trade's Rate Watch (click on inset to see the sign-up form).
• Complete an interactive coupon: Even normally wary consumers will hand over a surprising amount of personal data if you provide a tangible benefit, such as a significant discount or valuable freebie. One of our favorite examples, which was used continuously for more than five years, was Salem Five Bank's <salemfive.com> $100-off Mortgage Closing Costs coupon. The coupon, which is no longer used, required users to enter their name, phone number, and email address. Then they could print a personalized coupon that would save them $100 on a mortgage.
• Fine-tune these calculations: Users wishing to perform deeper analysis will be asked to register first. Registration should be brief: name, email address, and optional phone number. You can also capture inputs to the calculator, but intent to retain this data must be disclosed to the user.
• Lock in a special offer now: A tried-and-true DM practice, the time-sensitive offer. Tell users that rate/price/discount/premium can be locked in, if they enter their name and email address now.
• Sweepstakes/contests: It's one of the most cost-effective ways to pull a large volume of leads. The downside is the sheer volume of unqualified prospects that throw their name in the virtual hat for a chance at that iPod NANO. Make sure you include several simple qualifying questions. For examples, see the previous NB articles in the Advertising & Promotion category.
• Set up an appointment: This may not be selected by many, but you should offer the option of setting up a meeting on the phone or in a banking office to discuss the product further.
• Apply Now: Most importantly, ask for the order.

For more information:

• Lead Fusion's white paper, Attracting and Capturing Online Leads for the Financial Industry

One subject that doesn't get enough attention, online lead generation.

Now that most bank websites get more traffic than its branches, at least if you measure total number of visits*, you should be committing resources to maximizing the number of leads generated by your website.

Most banks have the low-hanging fruit covered with prominent phone numbers and website inquiry forms. But what about those prospects less willing to initiate a sales interaction?

My favorite presentation from the recent Net.Finance conference, and one I almost didn't attend because I thought it would be focused on offline activities, was Evaluating Online Lead Generation and Management, from Dave Herpers, Chief Marketing Officer at Amerisave, an online mortgage originator.

If you ever have a chance to hear him speak, I highly recommend it. Previously he was marketing director at DeepGreen Bank and also did a stint at Bank of America, so he has a great background in online lending.

Besides the fascinating discussion of the methodical generation and processing of online and telephone leads, he provided a number of ideas that financial services companies can use on their website to improve the number of leads available to sales people.

Action Items
As customers research products and use your online tools, allow them to have any of the results emailed to them for future reference. Customers like it because they don't lose all the work they've done and it's serves as a reminder as to where they found all the great info.

Mr. Herpers suggested the following email functions:

• Email me the results from the mortgage/refi/HEQ calculator
• Email me my estimated closing costs
• Email me the rate info I was just looking at
• Email me info on the products I was just looking at

Any customer who uses the email functionality becomes a valuable product lead.

Other lead generation opportunities:

• Contact Me buttons
• incomplete applications
• Request a Consultation form
• Rate Alerts

Amerisave reports that there best leads, other than telephone calls which are always first priority, are those from customers preforming rate searches at its website (see inset).

If you'd like to learn more about the best financial online marketing ideas, check out the Interactive Financial Marketing Database from our sister publication, the Online Banking Report.

Link: WSJ.com - Online Referrals For Home Sales Gain a Toehold.

Here's a way to gain incremental mortgage sales, new banking customers, and potentially a bit of direct fee income from your online services.

Develop an online real estate agent referral program.

Visitors would be able to query your website to find qualified agents specializing in their target neighborhoods. You could do it as a pure marketing play, with no incentives or referral fees; or you could provide eye-popping incentives, such as $2500+ gift cards from Home Depot or American Express offered by LendingTree at their realestate.com site.

In the LendingTree program, the value of the gift card depends on the size of the home purchased and/or sold (you receive an incentive for both buying and selling) as follows:

Incentive  Combined Value (bought & sold)
$250         $100,000
$500         $150,000
$1000       $250,000
$1500       $350,000
$2000       $450,000
$2500       $550,000
$5000       $1.1 million
$10,000    $2.1 million

The incentives are funded by the agent receiving the referral, who rebates a third of their sales commission to LendingTree. The consumer ends up with approximately $500 for every $100,000 in home value over $50,000.

LendingTree also tacks on an extra $100 if the buyer gets the mortgage from a LendingTree lender.

Currently, 7% of home buyers say they found their real estate agent through the Internet. (Source: National Association of Realtors study of transactions in 2003 and 2004, as cited by The Wall Street Journal, Dec. 9, 2004)

Caveats
This strategy is not for the faint of heart. While consumers will love it, driving additional business to your mortgage products, most real estate agents will hate it. So you have to weigh carefully whether it's worth the potential heat. If you rely on real estate agents for mortgage leads, you might want to consider the non-incentive version, where you simply forward home sales leads to agents based on zip code.

-- JB