Last year , we said the years 2001 and 2002 would be a period of great
opportunity for incumbent financial institutions, online lenders, and online
banking technology providers. Despite the recession and cutbacks in
corporate spending, we still believe those macro trends will continue.
Banks, who were very cautious in spending in 2001, will embark on new
projects now that online usage is pervasive among many of the most
profitable customers. With our confidence buoyed from our 9 out of 10
performance last year, OBR has polished its crystal ball and looked into the
new year. Trying not to sandbag as much this year, here are 10 predictions.
See if you agree.
One
Account aggregation is used by 3 to 4 million households by year-end,
begins to make a dent in the “Quicken segment”
Web-based account aggregation appears to be following an adoption curve
similar to Quicken in the ‘80s. First, attracting a small but rabid group of
users, then expanding into the larger sub-market of financial control
freaks. These early adopters will be intensely loyal; they will identify
problems and suggest improvements; and if listened to, will be vocal in
recommending the service to friends, family, and co-workers.
But there is a big difference with today’s account aggregation compared
to Quicken in the ‘80s: integration with and endorsement by the user’s
primary financial institution. Also, account aggregation is easier to use
than Quicken. Banks that figure out how to leverage this loyalty will begin
to gain market share during the next few years. But it will still be five or
six years before account aggregation becomes commonplace (see Table 2,
below).
Table 2
Account Aggregation Forecast
millions of active households
|
Year End |
Number |
% of All HHs |
% of OB HHs |
Year/Year Gain |
|
1999 |
0.1 |
0.1% |
1.0% |
n/a |
|
2000 |
0.3 |
0.3% |
1.9% |
200% |
|
2001 |
1.3 |
1.2% |
5.5% |
330% |
|
2002 |
3.6 |
3.4% |
13% |
180% |
|
2003 |
7.0 |
6.5% |
23% |
94% |
|
2004 |
10 |
9.3% |
30% |
43% |
|
2005 |
13 |
12% |
36% |
30% |
|
2006 |
15 |
14% |
39% |
15% |
| CAGR (2001 to 2006) |
63% |
Source: Online Banking Report, 12/31/01, +/- 40% OB=online banking
Two
Online statement access and payment at biller sites becomes one of the
most common online activities
We have long predicted the winning bill presentment model would consist
of bills emailed directly from biller to end-user. We also thought the
third-party aggregation/distribution model promoted by Microsoft’s
Transpoint and Checkfree and others would engender a fair amount
of activity at least initially. But with the combined Checkfree/Transpoint
entity distributing only 600,000 bills in Sept. 2001, compared to upwards of
32 million users accessing bills directly at billers,1 the
third-party bill aggregation/distribution model appears to be dying.2
Consumers who want all their electronic billing statements aggregated in
one place will do so with a self-service solution such as Yodlee,3
but for the vast majority of users who simply want to pay their bills with
the least amount of time and energy, exchanging emails directly with the
biller is the answer. Depending on user preferences, the email could contain
a link to a secure payment site or may merely serve as a confirmation of an
upcoming ACH (electronic) debit.
1According to Gartner Group, 12/3/01, Research Note:
SPA-14-8984
2Another data point: In December, Discover said 6 million
cardholders had registered for Web access to their Discover Card, 22% of
their card base.
3And a much smaller market of road-warriors and very early
adopters will use scan-and-pay bill payment from PayTrust.
Three
The remaining Net-only bank brands show signs of long-term prosperity,
especially in delivering loans and conservative investments
In 2000, Net-only bank brands came online at a rate of two per month.
While it’s unlikely we’ll ever see that level of activity again, we believe
the shakeout is mostly over and the remaining Net-only brands will turn
profitable if they haven’t already. This will draw more investment capital
and gradually expand their reach across the country. The total number of
Net-only brands1 won’t go much higher than the current total of
42, down 15% from the peak. New ones will come along, but existing ones will
merge or close their doors. We project a net increase of a half-dozen
Net-only brands during the next few years (see
Table 3, below).
Table 3
Number of U.S. Net-only Banks, 5-year Forecast
number of Net-only brands launched by year
|
Year |
New |
Closed3 |
Total Active |
|
Net Banks1 |
Trans. Portals2 |
| Actual |
|
|
|
|
| 1995 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
| 1996 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
| 1997 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
| 1998 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
| 1999 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
| 2000 |
22 |
4 |
1 |
49 |
| 2001 |
2 |
0 |
(9) |
42 |
| Forecast |
|
|
|
|
| 2002 |
2 |
1 |
(5) |
40 |
| 2003 |
3 |
1 |
(2) |
42 |
| 2004 |
4 |
1 |
(2) |
45 |
| 2005 |
4 |
0 |
(3) |
46 |
| 2006 |
5 |
0 |
(3) |
48 |
Source: Online Banking Report, 12/31/01
1Net-oriented bank brands can be partly or wholly owned by
brick-and-mortar financial institutions.
2Transactive portals: Non-bank financial portals that support
at least two of these three transactional banking services: bill payment,
interbank funds transfer, statement aggregation; includes Yahoo Finance,
OnMoney, GE Financial Network <gefn.com>, and AOL Personal Finance Channel.
3Merged, closed, or refocused on offline delivery channels.
Four
Loan auction marketplaces grow more popular and plentiful
Even though the Web is littered with online loan marketplaces that didn’t
make it (PrimeStreet, MortgageAuction, etc.), those companies had the right
idea; they were just ahead of their time and sunk by trying to grow too fast
too soon.
The success of LendingTree has not gone unnoticed by existing
lenders and independent entrepreneurs. A new breed of leaner loan
marketplaces, some bankrolled by existing financial institution lenders,
will attempt to grab some of LendingTree’s share.
A good example of a smaller, successful loan marketplace is CityLoans,
founded and operated by Alan Martin, a serial entrepreneur who has founded
three companies since he left his job as Webmaster of Security First Network
Bank in 1997. His latest startup, CityLoans, helps users shop the best rate
from local lenders. Like LendingTree, it takes a single application
and submits it to several lenders for a competitive quote. However, unlike
LendingTree, all CityLoans bids are from lenders located in the same
geographic location as the borrower, increasing the borrower’s comfort level
with the process. CityLoans operates in each market with a unique URL
incorporating each market’s predominant city, for example, AtlantaLoans.com,
DallasLoans.com, and so on (see below).
CityLoans operates loan “microsites” in most U.S. urban areas, taking
applications and passing them to local lenders for a fixed monthly
subscription fee
www.cityloans.com .
Five
Credit card statements become interactive
Now that nearly 15% of U.S. households are logging in to their credit
card statements, we expect card companies to rapidly create programs to tap
into this interest: balance transfer offers, aggregation of competitive
statements (see number 1), and so-called dynamic statements, which
offer Quicken-like features and integrated merchant support and advertising.
Synovus was the first major credit card with an interactive statement
called CardView. It uses Illuminated Statement
technology from Encirq.
Six
Niche aggregation sites are developed specializing in bills, loans, or
credit cards
Account aggregation is a technology with a myriad of useful applications
in financial services. Even though just 1 out of 100 households use it
today, its future is bright. Now that the underlying technology is stable,
we expect developers to take the basic platform and build niche applications
that appeal to certain customers or financial activities.
For example, credit card companies will offer “card aggregation” so that
users can create a master credit card statement on one site. The sponsoring
issuer then gets first crack at stealing loan balance from the competition.
Credit bureau scraping can also be used to supplement the account
information provided by the end user. NextCard and DeepGreen Bank
have both used credit bureau data feeds in their balance transfer programs,
although neither has added full account aggregation to their mix.
Another powerful niche opportunity is in the billing area. Banks and
other financial sites could assist users in the management of bills by
allowing them to aggregate all their bills on one site. Automated or manual
online payment services could be layered on top of the aggregated bills.
Seven
Low deposit rates send bank customers back to mutual funds
The lowest deposit rates in several decades will increase the number of
consumers shopping rates on- and off-line. To stem the loss of funds,
financial institutions will increase the availability and visibility of
mutual fund alternatives. Given the recent setbacks in the stock market, we
think bank customers would be most open to low-fee indexed funds.
A couple examples of this approach:
- X.com, in the days before it merged with
PayPal
to focus on email payments, offered a product line of interest checking,
money market deposits, and three indexed mutual funds mirroring the S&P 500,
bonds, and international equities.
- A more recent example is
ING Direct, which recently
launched six indexed mutual funds that can be mixed and matched into model
portfolios for various investor types.
Eight
Wealth management for the
mass market goes nowhere
One of the biggest buzzwords of late 2001, and one mentioned in nearly
every speech at BAI’s most recent Retail Delivery conference, was “wealth
management.” It’s an important service for the nation’s wealthiest 5%, but
one or more financial advisors already serve most of those households.
Wealth management as a stand-alone service has little appeal to the rest
of the population more concerned about managing their debt, college-tuition
savings, and 401ks. The mass market is unlikely to see value in spending any
of their spare time trying to figure out how to use services for the rich
and famous.
However, there is value in adding financial planning modules to your Web
offering. These modules should require a time commitment of no more than
five minutes and each should tackle one issue, such as Roth IRAs, saving for
college, and so on. We will cover this topic in more depth in an upcoming
issue.
Nine
Email marketing to current customers grows in sophistication and frequency
At year-end (2001), Discover said it had sent 50 million email payment
reminders to cardholders in the two years since it launched the service. That’s
a customer-centric approach lacking at many card companies.
Users expect their online service providers to use email to keep them up to
date. If you’re not using email, you are missing an opportunity to increase
sales, lower service costs, and tighten bonds with your growing online base.
We expect a significant increase in the number of electronic messages sent by
financial institutions to their customers. New tools and service providers make
the chore of creating and managing email much easier and more cost effective
than it was even a year ago. There are tools that automatically create HTML,
text, and AOL versions of your communications. Messages can be customized on the
fly to incorporate your customer’s product usage, preferences, etc.
The most effective email programs will include useful information culled from
the user’s accounts, such as confirmations of deposits, congratulations on
achieving savings goals, and so on .
Bonus Speculation
The NextCard brand lives on
NextCard appears doomed as an independent entity, but we believe
another credit card company will snap up its brand and customer base. How
about this scenario? CIBC buys the company and merges it with its
Juniper Financial unit letting Dick Vague repeat his magic from his
First USA days. Not a prediction, just a thought.
Ten
Yodlee has a great year, possibly pulling off an IPO, as consumer interest
in paying bills creates a strong pull for Yodlee’s platform
Clayton Christensen, Harvard professor, author of The Innovator’s Dilemma,
and a BAI Retail Delivery keynote speaker for the second time in three years,
talked about Yodlee in his Dec. 15 keynote. He likes account aggregation
and thinks it will have a significant impact on financial services, though he
stops short of calling it a disruptive innovation (it’s a sustaining
technology in Clayton-speak). However, like Intel and Microsoft, which
earned most of the profits from the PC revolution, he opined that Yodlee would
take home most of the profits from the new technology.
He is probably right in terms of outright fee income. Yodlee, currently paid
$6 to $12 per customer per year on top of a six-figure licensing contract, does
a great job in capturing the added value to the checking account. However, a few
bucks a year to Yodlee is small change compared to the value of the additional
business a bank, credit card issuer, or brokerage can book through aggregation
techniques (see #6). For example, a card company would only have to increase a
customer’s outstanding balance by about $100 to cover the $6 annual cost paid to
Yodlee.
No matter how you look at it, Yodlee is in a great position, boasting a:
- Valuable service not easily replicated by competitors or its
financial institution clients
- Large stable of blue chip customers including Yahoo, Wells
Fargo, Citibank, and Bank of America (a Yodlee investor); Bank of America
even took the Retail Delivery stage with Yodlee’s co-founder Sukhinder
Singh and raved about the program
- 90% share of the current market
- Potentially high margin service if they can get to “scale”
We don’t know what the privately held firm’s P&L looks like, but if it’s
close to breakeven, the company has a good chance of going public, especially if
the riskier PayPal IPO makes it out.